AirportCityGame.com is the Number One place to be when it comes to the hit game Airport City!
Real time chat to other players, trade items together, complete space missions, form & arrange alliances and much much more. It's all here at AirportCityGame.com
North Observatory is my top.
Also for some of these newer players that moan about 1 ad per day, think back to when there were no ads and you had to do things like this to upgrade a building!
Also done adventure destinations a lot...
The cap is 90/180 now Rico 👍
Only players with land at that price saw the in game pop up.
See here;
https://www.airportcitygame.com/threads/expansion-land-is-fix-price.39901/
Seems to be no change other than as laid out by Ur-quan here: https://www.airportcitygame.com/threads/ac-news-bulletin-03-02-2021.40024/post-532117
He stated that ‘special airship offers are planned’ - no sign of these, yet. The phrasing made it sound as if they’re still working on the details...
Yes. Since the horn of plenty works on these buildings, it seems strange that they don’t work on industries.
I hope they’ll at least consider this, now that these can will be acquired with airport cash....
What I mean by that, is often I will buy a lot of one plane type to manipulate task 3, but realistically most of the planes will never fly, just live in the RH.
Since I have 5 Condors, TBirds and Falcons, I’ll need 6 of a given plane for 3rd task...
On second thought, I don’t think it would work well in the manner described.
It would completely change the purpose of the RH. It would no longer be there to store other expensive planes/S planes and manipulate alliance tasks. In most cases, players would then be looking to maximise...
I like the idea, and it would make the subscription(s) more worthwhile. However it’ll create a massive delta between those with lots of RH slots and those without.
Lets see what G! have in store with the alliance rank shake up...
The new cap is 180/90. It only appeared in game for those at that price point. There was a thread about it here, but you’re right, we didn’t receive this information from G! directly to all.
Thanks for the info, it’s always appreciated.
I’m a little concerned about changing the cost of those buildings to greens. At first I thought it was an either/or cost, which I think is a great idea.
But changing these to greens only seems to make these less accessible to some players.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.